Syntax
sudocode feedback list [options]
Description
The feedback list command displays feedback entries from your project with powerful filtering options. Use this to:
View all feedback across your project
Find feedback for a specific spec or issue
Filter by feedback type (comment, suggestion, request)
Show only active or dismissed feedback
Identify feedback with stale anchors
Each feedback entry shows:
Feedback ID and status (active/dismissed)
Anchor status (valid/relocated/stale)
Source issue and target spec
Feedback type and location
Content preview (first 80 characters)
By default, shows up to 50 feedback entries. Use --limit to adjust.
Options
Filter by source issue Example: --issue ISSUE-001Shows only feedback provided by this issue.
Filter by target spec Example: --spec SPEC-001Shows only feedback received by this spec.
Filter by feedback type Example: --type requestValid types: comment, suggestion, request
Filter by dismissed status Example: --dismissed true or --dismissed false
true - Show only dismissed feedback
false - Show only active feedback
Omit to show both
Maximum number of results Example: --limit 100Limits the number of feedback entries returned.
Examples
List All Feedback
Show all feedback in the project:
Found 5 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
FB-002 [active] [valid] ISSUE-005 → SPEC-001
Type: comment | OAuth 2.0 Flow (line 30)
OAuth flow implemented successfully with PKCE extension
FB-003 [dismissed] [valid] ISSUE-010 → SPEC-002
Type: suggestion | API Endpoints (line 78)
Consider adding rate limiting to prevent abuse: 10 requests/minute per c...
FB-004 [active] [stale] ISSUE-015 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Error Handling (line 45)
Need clarification on error response format
FB-005 [active] [relocated] ISSUE-020 → SPEC-003
Type: suggestion | Data Model (line 92)
Consider using enum type instead of string constants
Filter by Spec
Show all feedback for a specific spec:
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001
Found 3 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
FB-002 [active] [valid] ISSUE-005 → SPEC-001
Type: comment | OAuth 2.0 Flow (line 30)
OAuth flow implemented successfully with PKCE extension
FB-004 [active] [stale] ISSUE-015 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Error Handling (line 45)
Need clarification on error response format
Filter by Issue
Show all feedback provided by a specific issue:
sudocode feedback list --issue ISSUE-001
Found 2 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
FB-006 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-002
Type: suggestion | API Design (line 15)
Consider using REST conventions for endpoint naming
Filter by Type
Show only request-type feedback:
sudocode feedback list --type request
Found 2 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
FB-004 [active] [stale] ISSUE-015 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Error Handling (line 45)
Need clarification on error response format
Show Only Active Feedback
Exclude dismissed feedback:
sudocode feedback list --dismissed false
Found 4 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
FB-002 [active] [valid] ISSUE-005 → SPEC-001
Type: comment | OAuth 2.0 Flow (line 30)
OAuth flow implemented successfully with PKCE extension
FB-004 [active] [stale] ISSUE-015 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Error Handling (line 45)
Need clarification on error response format
FB-005 [active] [relocated] ISSUE-020 → SPEC-003
Type: suggestion | Data Model (line 92)
Consider using enum type instead of string constants
Show Only Dismissed Feedback
View resolved feedback:
sudocode feedback list --dismissed true
Found 1 feedback item(s):
FB-003 [dismissed] [valid] ISSUE-010 → SPEC-002
Type: suggestion | API Endpoints (line 78)
Consider adding rate limiting to prevent abuse: 10 requests/minute per c...
Combine Multiple Filters
Show active requests for a specific spec:
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001 --type request --dismissed false
Found 2 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
FB-004 [active] [stale] ISSUE-015 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Error Handling (line 45)
Need clarification on error response format
Increase Result Limit
Show more results:
sudocode feedback list --limit 100
Found 87 feedback item(s):
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
...
[... 86 more entries ...]
JSON Output
Get machine-readable output:
sudocode --json feedback list --spec SPEC-001
[
{
"id" : "FB-001" ,
"issue_id" : "ISSUE-001" ,
"spec_id" : "SPEC-001" ,
"feedback_type" : "request" ,
"content" : "Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding window?" ,
"agent" : "alice" ,
"anchor" : {
"line_number" : 42 ,
"section_heading" : "Authentication Flow" ,
"text_snippet" : "Token expiration policy" ,
"anchor_status" : "valid" ,
"context_before" : "..." ,
"context_after" : "..."
},
"dismissed" : false ,
"created_at" : "2025-10-29T10:15:00Z" ,
"updated_at" : "2025-10-29T10:15:00Z"
},
{
"id" : "FB-002" ,
"issue_id" : "ISSUE-005" ,
"spec_id" : "SPEC-001" ,
"feedback_type" : "comment" ,
"content" : "OAuth flow implemented successfully with PKCE extension" ,
"agent" : "bob" ,
"anchor" : {
"line_number" : 30 ,
"section_heading" : "OAuth 2.0 Flow" ,
"text_snippet" : "OAuth implementation" ,
"anchor_status" : "valid" ,
"context_before" : "..." ,
"context_after" : "..."
},
"dismissed" : false ,
"created_at" : "2025-10-29T11:00:00Z" ,
"updated_at" : "2025-10-29T11:00:00Z"
}
]
Understanding Output
Status Indicators
Each feedback entry shows two status indicators:
Feedback Status [active] or [dismissed]
active - Feedback needs attention
dismissed - Feedback has been addressed or resolved
Dismissed feedback appears in gray.
Anchor Status [valid], [relocated], or [stale]
valid (green) - Anchor is accurate
relocated (yellow) - Content moved, anchor updated
stale (red) - Anchor may be invalid due to changes
Use feedback stale to find all stale anchors.
Each entry shows:
FB-001 [active] [valid] ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001
Type: request | Authentication Flow (line 42)
Token expiration policy not specified. Should we use fixed or sliding wi...
Breaking this down:
FB-001 - Feedback ID
[active] - Not dismissed
[valid] - Anchor is accurate
ISSUE-001 → SPEC-001 - From issue to spec
Type: request - Feedback type
Authentication Flow (line 42) - Location in spec
Token expiration… - Content preview (truncated at 80 chars)
Common Workflows
Review All Active Feedback
See what needs attention:
List active feedback
sudocode feedback list --dismissed false
Review each item
sudocode feedback show FB-001
Address or dismiss
Update spec or dismiss feedback as appropriate
Audit Spec Quality
Check all feedback for a spec:
List feedback for spec
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001
Identify patterns
Look for recurring issues or ambiguities
Update spec
Improve spec based on feedback
Dismiss addressed feedback
sudocode feedback dismiss FB-001
Find Requests Needing Response
Show all unanswered clarification requests:
sudocode feedback list --type request --dismissed false
Track Issue Feedback
See all feedback provided by an issue:
sudocode feedback list --issue ISSUE-042
This shows what ambiguities or suggestions the issue discovered during implementation.
Identify Stale Anchors
Find feedback that may need relocation:
sudocode feedback list | grep stale
Or use the dedicated command:
Filtering Strategies
By Source Find feedback from implementation # All feedback from an issue
sudocode feedback list --issue ISSUE-001
# All feedback from multiple issues (scripting)
for issue in ISSUE-001 ISSUE-002 ; do
sudocode feedback list --issue " $issue "
done
By Target Find feedback for a spec # All feedback on a spec
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001
# Active feedback only
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001 --dismissed false
By Type Filter by feedback nature # Questions needing answers
sudocode feedback list --type request --dismissed false
# Implementation notes
sudocode feedback list --type comment
# Improvement suggestions
sudocode feedback list --type suggestion --dismissed false
By Status Active vs resolved # Open feedback
sudocode feedback list --dismissed false
# Resolved feedback (audit trail)
sudocode feedback list --dismissed true
Scripting Examples
Generate Feedback Report
# Count feedback by type
echo "Active feedback by type:"
for type in comment suggestion request ; do
count = $( sudocode --json feedback list --type " $type " --dismissed false | jq 'length' )
echo " $type : $count "
done
Find Specs Needing Attention
# Specs with multiple active requests
sudocode --json feedback list --type request --dismissed false | \
jq -r '.[] | .spec_id' | \
sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head
Weekly Feedback Digest
# List all feedback added this week
sudocode --json feedback list | \
jq --arg week_ago "$( date -d '7 days ago' '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ')" \
'.[] | select(.created_at > $week_ago)'
Common Questions
How do I see feedback content in the list?
The list view shows a preview (first 80 characters). To see full content: sudocode feedback show FB-001
Not directly via CLI options. Use JSON output with jq: sudocode --json feedback list | jq '.[] | select(.agent == "alice")'
What's the difference between dismissed and deleted?
Dismissed - Marked as addressed but retained for audit trail
Deleted - No delete command exists; dismiss instead to preserve history
Can I list feedback by date range?
Use JSON output with jq filtering: sudocode --json feedback list | \
jq '.[] | select(.created_at > "2025-10-01")'
How do I find feedback with stale anchors?
Use the dedicated command: Or filter the list: sudocode --json feedback list | jq '.[] | select(.anchor.anchor_status == "stale")'
Does --limit affect all filters?
Yes, limit is applied after all filters. If you filter by spec and set limit to 10, you’ll get up to 10 results for that spec.
Troubleshooting
No feedback found (but I know there is feedback)
Cause: Filters are too restrictiveSolution:
Try removing filters one at a time:# Start broad
sudocode feedback list
# Add filters gradually
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001
sudocode feedback list --spec SPEC-001 --dismissed false
Anchor status shows as stale but content hasn't changed
Cause: Line numbers shifted due to edits elsewhere in specSolution:
Relocate the anchor:sudocode feedback relocate FB-001 --line 45
List is truncated at 50 items
Cause: Default limitSolution:
Increase the limit:sudocode feedback list --limit 1000
Can't filter by multiple specs
Cause: CLI doesn’t support multiple values for filtersSolution:
Use shell scripting:for spec in SPEC-001 SPEC-002 SPEC-003 ; do
sudocode feedback list --spec " $spec "
done
Next Steps
List active feedback
sudocode feedback list --dismissed false
Review details
sudocode feedback show FB-001
Address feedback
Update spec or respond to requests
Dismiss when done
sudocode feedback dismiss FB-001
Feedback System Concept Guide Learn more about the feedback system and bidirectional learning